|
Estero Development Report
Volume 10, Number 4, Issued November 2010
Produced by the Estero Council of Community Leaders
(ECCL)
For More Information about Estero
…see
www.esterofl.org
December Opportunities for Citizen Participation
in Protecting Estero's Quality of Life
|
Date
|
Time
|
Event
|
Location
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Tuesday, December 7th
|
9 a.m.
|
Troyer Brothers Mine Hearing before the
Lee County Hearing Examiner (4th day)
|
2nd Floor Hearing Room, 1500 Monroe Street in downtown Ft Myers
|
|
Wednesday, December 8th
|
9:30 a.m.
|
Metropolitan Planning Organization (MPO)
to Approve the 2035 Fiscally Feasible Plan
|
Cape Coral City Hall
|
|
Wednesday, December 8th
|
5 p.m.
|
Estero Design Review Committee (EDRC)
|
Estero Community Park
|
|
Tuesday, December 14th
|
6:00 p.m.
|
Estero Fire Rescue Meeting
|
Estero Fire Rescue Headquarters
|
|
Wednesday, December 15th
|
9 a.m.
|
Lee County Legislative Delegation Meeting
|
Taeni Hall (Room S-117) at Edison College in Ft. Myers
|
|
Friday, December 17th
|
1 p.m.
|
Estero Council of Community Leaders (ECCL)
|
Estero Community Park
|
|
Monday, December 20th
|
6 p.m.
|
Estero Community Planning Panel (ECPP)
|
Estero Community Park
|
Index
Estero Community Website
The community groups sponsoring the site are:
Estero Community Planning Panel (ECPP)
Estero Community Association (ECA)
Estero Design Review Committee (EDRC)
Estero Council of Community Leaders (ECCL)
Estero Parkway Wal-Mart
Zoning Presentations Go Well
On November 22nd
Wal-Mart’s development team made
presentations to the residents of The Vines and other communities surrounding the site and later to the Estero Community Planning Panel (ECPP). A
summary of the ECPP meeting, which about 100 Estero residents attended, follows:
Jeff Satfield of CPH Engineers assisted by Jim Winter and Theresa Murphy presented the revised Wal-Mart plans. Satfield
indicated that Wal-Mart seeks to rezone its 33-acre site on the northeast
corner of U.S. 41 and Estero Parkway to allow a 155,000 square-foot-store, down from 228,000, and to increase the number of outlots on U.S. 41 from
one to four. The 24-hour store would sell groceries, general merchandise, drugs store goods and garden supplies but would no long contain a Tire &
Lube facility.
His presentation was followed by comments from the panel
members. In general they were pleased with the appearance of the building. Their greatest concern was with the uses that would be approved for the
four outlots. They indicated that they would rather see offices or banks and not high-traffic generators like fast food restaurants on the
out-parcels. They asked the developer, and the devloper agreed, to prepare a list of outparcel uses to be submitted to the Panel for future review and
comment.
One of the members indicated that
he would like bike paths on the property. Satfield replied that bike paths could be
added to the walkways by widening them to 10 feet.
The Panel also raised questions
about the roadway interconnects
to the north and east, the access roads on US41 and Estero Parkway, signage, internal access to the outparcels from Estero Parkway, and roof noise.
Concern was expressed that the middle entrance off Estero Parkway may be too short a distance from US 41 (660’) to operate safely as a full access.
The developer provided the following information: there will be monument signs at each entrance; additional berms and
walls and moving the refrigeration compressors to the roof should provide additional noise reduction.
Audience suggestions –Public had more questions than comments but a representative of The Vines indicated
that The Vines community was strongly opposed to any interconnection that routed traffic to the Vines entrance. Other public comments indicted that
they too opposed too many drive throughs and fast-food stores in the outlots.
This meeting constitutes the formal meeting in the Estero
community that each developer is required to hold prior to filing his rezoning application with the County. The developer has to submit a detailed
report on the meeting to the County that must include a summary of the comments and suggestions made by the community.
Looking Ahead
Now the
developer will submit the rezoning proposal to Lee County where the following steps are necessary for approval of the rezoning:
- The
proposal will be reviewed by the County’s Community Development staff and a staff report will be prepared and sent to a County Hearing Examiner
with copies available to the public,
- The
Hearing Examiner conducts a public hearing on the application and prepares a report based on the hearings that includes a recommendation to the
Board of County Commissioners (BOCC). The public is invited to testify at this Hearing,
-
Finally, the BOCC conducts a hearing on the matter and votes to approve, deny or approve with conditions, the application. Only persons who
testify before the Hearing Examiner may testify before the BOCC.
Earlier Activities/Background
These meetings follow three informal meetings between Wal-Mart’s
consultants and contractual architect to discuss how the existing zoning might be modified for the smaller store that is now Wal-Mart’s national
standard model and still satisfy Estero’s unique appearance standards.
On June
17th many members of the Estero Community Planning Panel (ECPP) and the Estero Design Review Committee (EDRC) met with
Wal-Mart’s project architect and engineer to react to their effort to redesign
Wal-Mart’s corporate design for its new 155,000 square foot store in order to satisfy Estero’s unique appearance and big-box standards. The Estero
participants appreciated that Wal-Mart’s proposal was a great improvement over the standard store but made numerous suggestions for further
improvement.
At the
conclusion of the meeting Wal-Mart representatives indicated that they would now have to go back to the
drawing boards and consult with the Wal-Mart’s corporate architects to gain their approval before returning in a couple of months
On May
24th several members of the Estero Community Planning Panel (ECPP) and the Estero Design Review Committee (EDRC) met with
Wal-Mart’s project architect and engineer to discuss how Lee County and Estero
Comprehensive Plans and Land Development Code provisions should be used to modify Wal-Mart’s new, smaller store plans. The meeting produced a lively
discussion and many good ideas that Wal-Mart’s architect will incorporate into two draft proposals that will be discussed at a second meeting between
these parties, probably sometime in late June. The next steps in the process will be as outlined below.
On April
20th representatives of the Estero Community Planning Panel (ECPP) and the Estero Council of Community Leaders (ECCL) met with representatives of
Wal-Mart to learn about their plans for the Wal-Mart store zoned for the northeast corner of US 41 and Estero Parkway in 2003. Wal-Mart has not
constructed this store because their zoning prevents them from starting construction until six-laning of the segment of US 41 adjacent to the store
has begun. The US 41 widening project is expected to start later this year, in November or December.
The stores
representatives indicated at this meeting that Wal-Mart’s corporate leadership has approved a new, smaller store format for development throughout the
country. All their new stores will be much smaller than in the past. They are seeking to rezone this site for a 155,000 square foot store instead of
the currently zoned 228,000 square foot store. In addition they would like to add three out-lots to the site plan, using some, but not all, of the
surplus space included in the present zoning. The present plan includes one out-lot on the corner of Estero Parkway and US 41. The standard design of
their new stores varies greatly from the Mediterranean design approved by the County for this site, however they agreed that the corporate design
would have to be substantially modified in order to comply with Estero’s appearance standards imbedded in Chapter 33 of the Lee County Land
Development Code.
130 Estero Residents Participate in the Community Planning Workshop
Overview
It has been ten years since the Estero Community launched its
community planning effort, eight years since the existing Plan was adopted by the County Board and five years since the Board last updated the Estero
Chapter of the County Land Development Code.
Since then the Estero Community Planning Panel (ECPP) has been
intensively involved with the zoning of a large number of developments that include most of the land along the US 41 and Corkscrew Road commercial
corridors. In addition the Estero Design Review Committee (EDRC) has influenced the architecture, site plan,
landscape and appearance of scores of projects located in these developments.
Meanwhile Estero has tripled in population and property used
for commercial purposes has increased fourfold from less than 1,000,000 square feet to 4,500,000 square feet in spite of the sluggish market that has
persisted for the last four years.
This economic slowdown presents the ECPP and the community
with an outstanding opportunity to review and update our Community Plan and the Land Development Code provisions specific to Estero.
During November
The first major step in the Community Plan renewal process was
a large Community Planning Workshop held by the ECPP at the Hyatt Coconut Point Resort and Spa on Saturday, November 13th. The Workshop
began with brief presentations on:
·
how the Community Plan has been implemented since it was
adopted in 2002,
·
how the Estero Community has grown during the past decade,
and
·
how the meeting was to be conducted in order to gather
community input.
Then the participants were organized at 12 tables of 10 or so
participants including a moderator and scribe. Each moderator was armed with a list of community planning topics intended to stimulate discussion at
each table. After more than two hours of discussion representatives of each table summarized the table’s conclusions about the four areas of
discussion that had been outlined by the moderators.
Erik Dickens, a member of the ECPP, prepared an excellent
draft summary of the Workshop for the members of the ECPP and the residents of Estero. Some excerpts follow:
Excerpts from Dicken’s
Workshop Summary
The complete summary report cites all the comments contained
in the table summaries that have thus far been returned and has codified the comments based on how often they were made by the Workshop participants.
The comments are color coded as follows in order to indicate the number of participants that mentioned the issue:
This is a comment that was repeated at
least 5 times.
This is a comment that was repeated 3
or 4 times.
This is a comment that was repeated 2
times.
Most prevalent comments:
Architecture and Landscaping:
·
More architectural
variety needed.
·
Incorporate bike paths
into developments.
·
Need better code
enforcement of signage, strip malls, RR, and vacant properties.
·
Mostly Mediterranean style
with pockets of Old Florida.
·
Landscaping irrigation
issues a concern
·
Estero Gateway signs:
"Welcome to Estero" needed.
Overview
The community likes the method Estero has in place (EDRC, ECPP) to approve projects
and protect Estero and feels these groups are doing a good job. In general, with limited exceptions, it is
felt Estero should not reduce design standards to promote growth. As one person put it “what’s built ugly
stays ugly.”
The architecture comments were mostly in favor of Mediterranean with some Old
Florida mixed in. There were also many comments suggesting a mix of different architectures would be nice
assuming it is tastefully done.
Landscaping comments were all over the spectrum with no specific theme coming
through.
Mobility:
·
Add Light Rail
·
Dedicated RH-turn lane
from Three Oaks to Corkscrew so people don’t go through gas station
·
Get bike paths off of
streets
·
Crossing major roads
on bikes is dangerous and needs large scale improvement.
·
RR bed conversion to
bike path/trail
Overview
Long-term mobility was lightly addressed, inspired strictly by
the questions asked by the table moderators. Of more concern were mobility issues perceived as being
current and dangerous. Many problem intersections were listed along with the general concern about bicycle
lanes on heavily trafficked streets.
Bike paths and Linear Park plans were frequently addressed.
Almost every table stated the bike paths should not be integrated with heavily trafficked roadways.
Of special concern was the danger to bikes on Corkscrew at the 41 and Three Oaks intersection.
Also emphasized was the connecting of parks, local town
centers, libraries, or ‘nodes’ with bike and pedestrian pathways. This integrated well with the idea of a
connected and/or linear park plan.
Sense of Place:
·
Diversify local
economy with some employment centers other than retail. Non-retail should be sought after.
·
Improve year around
employment by creating mixed use areas
·
More public access to
rivers and bay, create parks near major waterways
·
Need an Arts District
·
More integration with
Florida Gulf Coast University
Overview
Biggest area of concern for Sense of Place was the waterways.
Every table mentioned Estero’s waterways but were concerned that either no access or no community areas on them.
This theme is repeated in the Mobility section, especially around parks, pedestrian and bicycle paths.
People were also concerned there was little interactivity with Florida Gulf Coast
University. It was felt the University offered many opportunities that were not being realized including
arts, white collar jobs and increasing staffing for year-round employment opportunities.
There appeared to be some confusion over exactly what a Town Center is supposed to
be. Some thought a Town Center would be comprised of local and government offices with some public
entertainment venues. Others thought a Town Center would be a social focal point for Estero. Votes for or
against a Town Center were almost evenly split.
Conclusion
The full report will be posted on the ECPP website once it has been approved by the
ECPP. The ECPP will be scheduling a series of public meetings throughout most of 2011 in order to research
each suggestion and develop those that are deemed to be most significant and needed by the community.
Troyer Brothers Mine Battle Continues
On December 7th the Troyer Brothers
Mine public
hearing will continue with presentations by Lee County Staff. Additional dates of December 8th and 9th have been set aside for
the hearing if needed.
During the first three
days of public hearing we’ve had excellent support by the public with more than 40 residents from Estero, Corkscrew and Lehigh speaking in opposition
to this project. However, if we’re to continue our successes of the past it’s essential that we have as many residents as possible speak in person at
the public hearing. The hearing takes place at the Hearing Examiner’s Meeting Room – 2nd Floor, 1500 Monroe Street in downtown Ft. Myers.
As has been done in prior cases, the last hour or so of each
hearing day is set aside for public comment. If you do not appear before the Hearing Examiner, by law you will not be permitted to appear before the
Board of County Commissioners at the final hearing in this case.
Lee County Staff has issued a recommendation of DENIAL of the
Troyer Brothers Mine application, finding it inconsistent with the Lee Plan, incompatible with surrounding uses, fails to protect natural and
environmental resources, and fails to meet traffic standards.
Background:
On November 17th a Lee County Hearing Examiner
began consideration of another Corkscrew Road mining application; the third application to proceed through the County’s rezoning process in the last 3
years. This project is called “Troyer Brothers Excavation” and would rezone 1,803 acres from Agriculture District (AG-2) to Mine Excavation Planned
Development (MEPD) to allow mining activities including administrative offices and rock crushing operations. A 110 foot maximum mine depth is proposed
with a mine duration is 35 years. In addition blasting and dewatering are proposed. At over 1800 acres, this is the largest mine yet proposed for the
DR/GR area.
Over 50
Estero residents testified against each of the last two Corkscrew Road mines
…we look
forward to your support once again.
This will be the first mine application to be heard using the
revised Lee County Mining Code adopted by the BOCC on September 9, 2008.
In June 2010 the Board of County Commissioners (BOCC) voted
unanimously to deny zoning for the 1,365 acre RCH mine on east Corkscrew Road after 22 days of Hearing by a County Hearing Examiner who recommended
approval of the mine. This mine would have produced an average of 3,000 round-trip truck trips per day for the next 30 years. As a result of a court
order this mine was heard under the old, far less stringent County mining regulations.
On June 16, 2008 the BOCC voted unanimously to deny zoning for
the 318 acre Estero Group mine located about 7 miles east of I-75 on Corkscrew Road after a then record 17 days of Hearings before a Lee County
Hearing Examiner.
As in the RCH Mine case the lawyers for Troyer Brothers have
asked to have someone other than Lee County’s Chief Hearing Examiner Diana Parker hear the case. In the RCH Case Judge Parker agreed to step aside and
the case was assigned to an Assistant Hearing Examiner with no experience in such matters.
This time Lee County raised objections to this motion and a
hearing was scheduled for November 2nd. Hearing Examiner Diana Parker denied the applicant’s motion that she recuse (remove) herself,
however she left the door open by saying that the applicant could restate their motion at the time of the hearing “should she be the Examiner assigned
to the case”. Once again she appointed the Assistant Hearing Examiner to hear this case.
Unlike the recent RCH mine hearing which proceeded by Court
order, the Troyer Brothers application has met the County’s sufficiency requirements under the new Chapter 12 Mining standards of the Land Development
Code adopted by the BOCC in late 2008. These guidelines are quite stringent in terms of water modeling and monitoring.
The proposed Troyer Mine is located outside of the “Preferred
Mining Area” overlay map which is part of the pending DR/GR Comp Plan Amendment. But because of the pending status, it will not be considered by the
HEX in this case.
The Troyer Mine property has an existing unpaved access road
entrance on Corkscrew Road, however the applicant is not proposing use of this entrance for dump trucks “at this time”.
The County’s Long Range Transportation Financially Feasible Plan Hearing Completed in November
Overview
If a road project is not in the
Long Range Transportation Plan (LRTP)
it cannot be built. When Federal legislation was approved to allocate $10 million to the Coconut Road/I-75 Interchange it could not be built until the
project was added to the LRTP. We defeated that road by successfully fighting for years to keep it out of the LRTP.
Every five years the Lee Metropolitan Planning Organization (MPO) is
required to update the LRTP and extend it for at least the next 20 years. In Lee County transportation planning is performed by the MPO, a panel of 17
members consisting of public officials from Lee County (all 5 Commissioners) and the five Lee County municipalities.
The planning process consists of two steps:
-
Step one, the “Needs Plan”, involves projecting the demographic and development changes that will occur during the
planning period and the transportation needs that they require.
-
The second step, the “Fiscally Feasible Plan”, requires estimation of transportation revenues from all sources, local,
state and Federal and how they should be allocated to the needed facilities.
The 2035 Financially Feasible Plan
On October 26th the MPO presented the draft 2035 Fiscally
Feasible Plan at a Public Hearing in the Three Oaks Banquet Center in Estero. In recent years the primary sources of transportation funding have
declined significantly. Federal and State fuel taxes started to shrink even before the economy became soft due to the impact of high fuel prices and
expanded use of more fuel efficient vehicles. In Florida most County and municipal transportation funds come from road impact fees. In Lee County
these funds are down about 90% in recent years due to major declines in residential and commercial development.
As a result none of the new Estero road projects included in the 2035
Needs Plan are funded in the draft Financially Feasible report. The MPO will approve the final Financially Feasible Plan on December 8th.
The 2035 Plan will then
be forwarded to FDOT and the Federal Highway Administration for their approval.
During November
On November 19th the MPO heard the staff recommendations and
took public input regarding the 2035 Financially Feasible Plan. At this meeting the ECCL urged the MPO and FDOT to reevaluate the underlying
demographic and development projections that were used as the basis for failing to fund the Corkscrew/I-75 Interchange and the widening of Corkscrew
Road surrounding this interchange. The testimony pointed out that Estero has about 7.5 million square feet of unbuilt commercially zoned land that
will be served by this interchange, mostly before 2035.
MPO and FDOT staff continue to point out that the Corkscrew/I-75
Interchange is part of the State’s Strategic Intermodal System (SIS) and therefore must compete statewide for Federal and State funding.
Commissioner Manning asked the MPO staff to continue the consideration
of these projects until the December 8th meeting when a final decision will be made on the Financially Feasible Plan by the MPO. Continued
pressure from the community may result in some seed money being provided for these projects and/or their being added to the priority list for future
economic stimulus or other unbudgeted funds.
The 2035 Needs Plan
On October 22nd the MPO adopted a 2035 Needs Plan that is
consistent with Estero’s needs. It contains the following Estero projects:
·
Corkscrew Road six laning from Three Oaks Parkway to Ben Hill Griffin
·
The Corkscrew Road/I-75 Interchange widening and reconstruction
·
Three Oaks Parkway six laning from Coconut Road to Estero Parkway
·
Sandy Lane from Corkscrew Road to Estero Parkway, a new two lane road
·
Via Coconut Point from the south end of Coconut Point to Old 41 in
Bonita Springs, a new four lane segment.
In addition the Needs Plan removes two projects that Estero has long
opposed:
·
The Coconut Road/I-75 Interchange and its associated approaches, and
·
County Road 951 (CR951), a four lane roadway that would run parallel to
I-75 through the environmentally sensitive Density Reduction/Groundwater Resource (DR/GR) area on the east side of I-75.
Removing CR951 from the Needs Plan was one of three controversial
decisions that the MPO decided in approving the Needs Plan. In the end the MPO voted 12 to 2 in favor of removing CR951 after a concerted effort by
the City of Bonita Springs to keep it in the Needs Plan.
Eliminating CR951 accomplishes several community goals:
·
lowers the cost of the 4,000 acre Edison Farms acquisition and
restoration;
·
preserves wetlands that store and clean rains that flow from the middle
of the state through the DR/GR and into our rivers and streams and ultimately into Estero Bay
·
reduces the threat of flooding for Estero,
·
increases the region’s water supply, and
·
preserves Estero Bay as a tourist attraction.
Airplane Noise Progress Report
On November 8th the Lee County Port Authority, the
operators of Southwest Florida International Airport (RSW), met and approved the following items:
1)
Accept a federal and a state grant for an airplane tracking
system. This system, when implemented in the spring of 2011, will allow any Estero resident to use his personal computer to view the following
information about any flight that they found annoying to them:
·
The track of the aircraft
·
The name of the carrier
·
The tail number
·
The flight number
·
The elevation of the flight as it went over their home
This information may be used to notify the Port Authority of
any flight that has not followed the prescribed approach path.
2)
The Port Authority Board, following the recommendation of the Airport Special Management Committee, selected ESA Airports to conduct the
next Part 150 Noise Study required by Federal law every five years. The Authority staff will now negotiate the terms of a noise study contract with
ESA. The study should begin by mid-2011
On November 10th several members of the
South Lee County Airplane Noise Committee met with FAA and Port Authority officials to review updated FAA information on the noise issues the
Committee has been discussing with the FAA since the new arrival patterns were instituted in October 2008. Their report included the following:
- A review of traffic patterns from the summer showed that
almost all the aircraft using the SHIFTY 2 (the new pattern that brings aircraft over Estero) went out over the Gulf before turning back to the
airport. This is an improvement from earlier when a large number of flights were “turning early” which brought the planes over more communities
between Estero and the airport.
- The FAA agreed to supply the Committee with additional
information on the use of alternative routes and a more detailed explanation of the reasons why one of our noise relief proposals cannot be
implemented.
- The FAA reviewed their plans for implementing the
satellite based “Next Generation” air traffic controlling system at RSW with the Committee. The FAA is currently conducting tests around the
country that will allow aircraft to approach airports (including RSW) in a controlled “constant descent” approach. This new system will allow
planes to approach airports and then use this constant descent procedure that will permit lower engine power (and sound) all the way into the
airport. This is in contrast to the current procedures where aircraft use a stair step procedure to repeatedly lower their altitude and then
increase velocity (and noise). The result would be a very significant decrease in noise level of approaching aircraft. We can expect this to be
implemented in airports around the country over the next 5 or 6 years, but the FAA indicated that RSW could well be among the earlier users for
airports of its size.
- The FAA is committed to working with the Committee to
find additional ways to reduce airplane noise over our area from aircraft approach RSW from the northeastern U. S.
The Committee has been working with the Port
Authority Commissioners (They are the same as our Lee County Commissioners) to try and get some representation from south Lee County on the Airport
Special Management Committee. If we succeed in this effort we will be in a better position to continuously encourage the Port Authority to be more
proactive with the FAA regarding any changes that could negatively affect the residents of south Lee County.
Background Information
In October 2008 the Federal Aviation
Administration (FAA) changed the flight patterns for commercial aircraft departing to or arriving
from the northeastern section of the United States. As a result many Estero communities began to be impacted by noise from these aircraft. At that
time the Estero Council of Community Leaders (ECCL) and the Brooks Concerned Citizens (BCC) formed a committee to work on this problem.
During the last two years the Committee has worked
with the Regional Office of the FAA in an effort to reroute these flights or to alter these flight patterns so that they will provide noise relief for
the residents of Estero. As a result of this effort some of the flights are being rerouted while other planes are flying higher than before. In
addition the FAA has initiated a monitoring system that will soon be providing the Committee with periodic reports that will allow the Committee to
assess the impact of the changes.
In the process of its work the Committee learned
that many comparable airports have installed flight tracking systems that permit residents living in the airport’s flight paths to use their personal
computers to learn the altitude of any of the flights over their home. If that information indicated that the flight was below the required altitude
the resident may then report it to the FAA and the Port Authority.
The Authority has requested proposals for the
system’s purchase and has received a proposal from Bruel & Kjaer Environmental Solutions. The proposal has been reviewed by staff and submitted to the
FAA for compliance assurance. On September 28th the Airport Special Management Committee approved the purchase of the tracking system.
Every five years the Airport Authority is required
by the FAA to update it Part 150 Noise Study. At the September 28th meeting of the Airport Special Management Committee four noise
consultants were interviewed and the Committee voted to rank ESA Airports first among the applicants for the job. Upon approval by the Port Authority
Board staff will negotiate the terms of a noise study contract with ESA.
Members of the ECCL and BCC spoke with the ESA
Airports representatives after the meeting. They are well aware of the noise issues produced by the 2008 landing pattern changes and promised to hold
one or more hearings in Estero to determine what alternatives might be feasible in order to address the communities concerns.
Estero’s Housing Permits
Continue Extremely Slow Pace
During October, eleven single family homes and two duplexes with a building value of only $1.3 million were permitted in
Estero. All the permits this month were for lesser-priced homes in Bella Terra, East of I-75 on Corkscrew. This continued slowdown in construction of
new homes is helping to reduce the inventory of unsold new homes constructed in Estero during 2005 when 2,833 units were permitted.
Housing units permitted on a year-to
date basis during 2010 are up modestly over the two prior years, but the figure remains far below the comparable figures for
2000-2006 and equals only 12% of the figure during 2002, the season immediately following the tragedy of 9/11/2001. In addition, the average building
value, exclusive of land, has fallen precipitously this year to compete with the lower prices of existing housing units available on the market.
Of the 130 single family homes (building value of only $23.5
M) permitted so far this year, 63% of the units have been generated by Lennar’s Bella Terra. The two Toll
Brothers’ developments (Belle Lago and The Reserve of Estero) on Estero Parkway have contributed another 25% of the total.
The following table shows how the first ten months of 2010 compares with the same period of the prior ten years:
|
Year
|
Annual Total Housing Units
|
Building Value of Units
|
Average Building Value Per Unit
|
Percentage of Single Family Units
|
|
2000
|
1,861
|
$259,965,981
|
$139,692
|
41 %
|
|
2001
|
1,863
|
284,286,846
|
152,963
|
47
|
|
2002
|
1,355
|
251,080,157
|
185,299
|
51
|
|
2003
|
1,304
|
206,336,314
|
158,233
|
44
|
|
2004
|
1,393
|
307,246,114
|
220,564
|
63
|
|
2005
|
2,561
|
572,711,293
|
223,628
|
48
|
|
2006
|
1,235
|
320,509,719
|
259,522
|
38
|
|
2007
|
416
|
116,889,675
|
280,985
|
36
|
|
2008
|
143
|
48,334,352
|
338,002
|
80
|
|
2009
|
137
|
42,671,061
|
311,468
|
78
|
|
2010
|
166
|
32,951,160
|
198,501
|
78
|
The County permit information used in this report may be found at
http://www.lee-county.com/dcd/Reports/EsteroReports.htm
Estero’s Permitted Commercial Building Values Continue Decline
During October, only $318,000 of permits was issued for Estero commercial buildings. As shown below, for the first ten
months year-to-date, the value of
commercial buildings permitted in Estero totaled only $7.3 million, by far the smallest year-to-date total on record.
|
Year
|
Year to Date
|
Annual Total
|
|
2000
|
$74,191,144
|
$77,250,835
|
|
2001
|
36,770,251
|
44,116,526
|
|
2002
|
21,575,789
|
23,135,139
|
|
2003
|
17,809,178
|
23,234,725
|
|
2004
|
40,832,565
|
60,859,820
|
|
2005
|
71,014,931
|
111,037,977
|
|
2006
|
177,322,397
|
184,709.240
|
|
2007
|
152,471,225
|
157,614,045
|
|
2008
|
38,454,732
|
39,261,677
|
|
2009
|
9,250,703
|
9,752,556
|
|
2010
|
7,275,517
|
?
|
As the above table indicates, Estero’s commercial development started to expand rapidly in 2004 and peaked in 2006 with a
total of $184.7 million (excluding the land values). Total commercial investment in Estero has fallen precipitously since 2007 and continues to fall
below the very low level of 2009.
From January through October, the major projects that contributed to the 2010 year-to-date total are:
$3,904,000 in
the Coconut Point Town Center
$1,200,000 for improvements to the Lee County Corkscrew Road Wellfield
$1,875,000 for
Miramar
Outlets expansion
$800,000 for a
new bank in the Coconut Trace Center
$619,000 for
Villages of Country Creek Water Storage System
$638,000 for
Meadows of Estero
$400,000 for
Wildcat Run Country Club
$247,000 for
remodeling Bonita Health Center
$202,000 for The
Brooks Town Center
$128,000 for
Corkscrew Palms
$104,800 for
Estero Park Commons
$48,000 for Hyatt
Equities Improvements
Reminder: The building values
understate the cost of each residence or commercial building because they exclude the value of the underlying land.
|